A regional study found that what percent of on-the-job accidents occurred on days crews were merged or doubled due to absenteeism?

A regional study found that what percent of on-the-job accidents occurred on days crews were merged or doubled due to absenteeism?

• A. 60 %
• B. 40 %
• C. 20 %
• D. 80 %

Answer: (A)

When staffing gaps from absenteeism occur, crews can be merged or doubled, which tends to raise safety risks. The pressures of fatigue, rushing, and communication gaps make accidents more likely on those days. The regional study’s finding that about 60% of on-the-job accidents happened on days with merged or doubled crews shows a strong link between absenteeism-driven staffing issues and accidents. This indicates safety is significantly affected by how well we manage workforce availability, not just overall productivity. Why the other numbers don’t fit as well: 40% or 20% would mean fewer than half of accidents are tied to those days, underplaying the impact of staffing strain. 80% would imply an even larger majority than reported, which isn’t what the data show.

When staffing gaps from absenteeism occur, crews can be merged or doubled, which tends to raise safety risks. The pressures of fatigue, rushing, and communication gaps make accidents more likely on those days. The regional study’s finding that about 60% of on-the-job accidents happened on days with merged or doubled crews shows a strong link between absenteeism-driven staffing issues and accidents. This indicates safety is significantly affected by how well we manage workforce availability, not just overall productivity.

Why the other numbers don’t fit as well: 40% or 20% would mean fewer than half of accidents are tied to those days, underplaying the impact of staffing strain. 80% would imply an even larger majority than reported, which isn’t what the data show.